Coleridge, Lamb, Hazlitt, and the Reader of Drama
University of Missouri Press, 1990 - 224 pages
Many nineteenth-century writers believed that the best tragedy should be read rather than performed, and they have often been attacked for their views by later critics. Through detailed analysis of Coleridge's Shakespearean Criticism, Lamb's On the Tragedies of Shakespeare, and Hazlitt's Characters of Shakespeare's Plays, Heller shows that in their concern with educating the reader these Romantics anticipate twentieth-century reader response criticism, educational theory, and film criticism.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Romantics Critique of Appeals
Hazlitts Appeal to Readers
Lamb and ReaderResponse Criticism
1 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abstraction According action active actors appeals argues audience authors beauty become believes British century characters Charles cited Coleridge Coleridge's comedy Complete concern considers contemporary contrast Criticism designed develop discussion drama Edited effect emphasizes English especially Essays example experience eyes fact feel finds Friend give Hamlet Hazlitt History human ideas illusion imagination important influenced insists intellectual interest James John Lamb Lamb's language learning lecture Letters Lewes literary literature London Macbeth means mind moral nature nineteenth-century Note objects painting passage performance person plays playwright poem poet poetic poetry points praises Preface present Press principles productions Prose published reader reading refers Review Richard romantics scene scenery senses Shakespeare Shakespeare's plays Shaw Shelley Similarly spectacle spectators stage stresses Study sympathy taste theater things thought tion tragedy true understand University Press vols Wilde writers Yeats York