...shells in the business, but that these cockle-hke stones are everywhere as they are at present bfdts sui generis, and never were any part of an animal....quarry shells have no parts of a different texture from №* rock in question whence they were taken ; ш»1^ that there is no such thing as shell in these...

...the fossils had ever belonged to living creatures, f" For our English inland quarries," he said, " I am apt to think there is no such matter as petrifying...sui generis, and never were any part of an animal," that they " have no parts of a different texture from the rock or quarry whence they are taken, that...

...at good distance too from the sea. But for our English in' land quarries, I am apt to think, there h no such matter as petrifying of ' shells in the business : but that these cockle-like ttonet are everywhere ai * they are at present, Lapidet sui generis, and never were any part of an...

..."my argument will fall, and I shall be happily convinced of an Errour". Until then, he maintained, "I am apt to think, there is no such matter, as Petrifying...Shells in the business . . . but that these Cockle-like shells ever were, as they are at present, lapides sui generis, and never any part of an Animal". The...

...said, "which also abound with infinite number and great varieties of shells, I am apt to think, that there is no such matter as Petrifying of Shells in the business." The "Cockle-like stones" were stones and had always been stones. They had never been any part of an...

...belonged to extinct species, but extinction was not widely accepted at the time, and Lister concluded: "I am apt to think, there is no such matter, as Petrifying...Shells in the business. ..but that these Cockle-like shells ever were, as they are at present, lapides sui generis (stones of their own kind), and never...