The Objective Eye: Color, Form, and Reality in the Theory of Art“The longer you work, the more the mystery deepens of what appearance is, or how what is called appearance can be made in another medium."—Francis Bacon, painter This, in a nutshell, is the central problem in the theory of art. It has fascinated philosophers from Plato to Wittgenstein. And it fascinates artists and art historians, who have always drawn extensively on philosophical ideas about language and representation, and on ideas about vision and the visible world that have deep philosophical roots. John Hyman’s The Objective Eye is a radical treatment of this problem, deeply informed by the history of philosophy and science, but entirely fresh. The questions tackled here are fundamental ones: Is our experience of color an illusion? How does the metaphysical status of colors differ from that of shapes? What is the difference between a picture and a written text? Why are some pictures said to be more realistic than others? Is it because they are especially truthful or, on the contrary, because they deceive the eye? The Objective Eye explores the fundamental concepts we use constantly in our most innocent thoughts and conversations about art, as well as in the most sophisticated art theory. The book progresses from pure philosophy to applied philosophy and ranges from the metaphysics of color to Renaissance perspective, from anatomy in ancient Greece to impressionism in nineteenth-century France. Philosophers, art historians, and students of the arts will find The Objective Eye challenging and absorbing. |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
The Objective Eye: Color, Form, and Reality in the Theory of Art John Hyman No preview available - 2006 |
The Objective Eye: Color, Form, and Reality in the Theory of Art John Hyman No preview available - 2006 |
Common terms and phrases
accept appearance argues argument artist basic beauty bodies called Cambridge cause century chapter claim conception conventions define depends depict Descartes describe different distinction doctrine drawing effect example exist experience explain express face fact false fig first follows frame Goodman gross color hand Hence human idea illusion imply kind language less light line of sight London looks marks matter means mind nature objects observers occlusion shape occur optical Oxford Painter painting particular perceive perception perspective philosophers phrase physical pictorial art picture possible predicate principle produce properties qualities question realism reason reference reflections relation relative remark representation represents resemblance retinal image round seems seen sensations sense smell space special relativity spectator standing statement surface symbols taste theory things thought tion true truth University Press visible visual writes York