...Tuesday, the 10th, and was not brought to a conclusion until late on Saturday afternoon, the 14th. It was an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendants...might be ordered to pay the amount found due. 202 There were a great number of picas, but the substantial defence was, that the plaintiff was not the...

...bad, and that a distress taken by virtue of it was altogether void. This was an action of trespass brought by the plaintiff against the defendants, to recover damages for the seizure and detention of a coach and two horses of the plaintiff. The defendants pleaded not guilty,...

...Tuesday, the 10th, and was not brought to a conclusion until late on Saturday afternoon, the 14th. It was an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendants...defendants might be ordered to pay the amount found due. There were a great number of pleas, but the substantial defence was, that the plaintiff was not the...

...a conclusion until late on Saturday afternoon, the 14th. It was an action brought by the plaintitf against the defendants to recover damages for the...purifying coal gas from sulphuretted hydrogen by means of hydrated oxide of iron. The declaration also claimed an injunction against further infringement, and...

...court of the United States for the district of Massachusetts. It is an action by the plaintiff in error against the defendants, to recover damages for the infringement of a patent right, obtained by the plaintiff on the 16th of November, 1839. The patent is in the usual form, and...

...two coach horses, and conveying a person in the said coach for hire. THIS was an action of trespass brought by the plaintiff against the defendants to recover damages for the seizure and detention of a coach and two horses of the plaintiff. The defendants pleaded the general...

...responsibility of the Company was unreasonable within sect. 61, and therefore void? rPHIS action was brought by the plaintiff against the defendants to recover damages for the misdelivery by them of a telegraphic message. A case was stated by order of the Court. The plaintiff...

...four years after the right of action accrues : Code, section 3003. WARNER, Chief Justice. This was an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendants to recover damages for causing water to be thrown upon the plaintiff's land by the construction of their drains and sewers...

...NISBET, for defendant. Guernsey, Bartnim * Hendrix r«. Shcllman. WARNER, Chief Justice. Tliis was an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendants to recover damages alleged to have been sustained in consequence of an alleged breach of contract in the building of a...

...to pny thf rates is at least a tenant at „•ill. Appeal from pidgment of a'fieckett, J. This was an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendants to recover damages for trespass on certain land in Flemington Koad. The trespass consisted in entering his land pulling down...