 | 1906 - 290 pages
...indicated in section 7 supervenes. Section 7. On names that are to be rejected, changed or modified. Art. 50. No one is authorised to reject, change or modify...contestable or of little import. (See also art. 57.) Examples. — This rule was broken by the change of Staphylea to Staphylis, Tamus to Thamnos, Mentha... | |
 | Berthold Seemann - 1906 - 558 pages
...Section 7. ON NAMES THAT ARE TO BE BEJEOTED, CHANGED, OR MODIFIED. Article 50. No one is authorized to reject, change, or modify a name (or combination...either contestable or of little import. (See also Article 67.) Examples. — This rule was broken by the change of Staphylea to Staphylis, Tamus to Thamnos,... | |
 | Royal Society of Victoria (Melbourne, Vic.) - 1906 - 506 pages
...1905, says: — "No one is authorised to reject, change or modify a name (or combination of names) because of the existence of an earlier homonym which...other motive either contestable or of little import.." Hence the names should remain as before, L. Brownii Britten being a synonym for L. straminea (R.Br.),... | |
 | Berthold Seemann - 1908 - 602 pages
...1905, says : — ' No one is authorized to reject, change, or modify a name Cor combination of names) because of the existence of an earlier homonym, which...regarded as non-valid, or for any other motive either eontestable or of little import.' Hence the names should remain as before, L. Brownii Britten being... | |
 | Albert Spear Hitchcock - 1914 - 316 pages
...to the rules [usually referred to as "list of nomina conservanda"]. (Art. 20.) No one is authorized to reject, change or modify a name (or combination...regarded as non-valid, or for any other motive either contestible or of little import. (Art. 50.) When a species is moved from one genus into another, its... | |
 | Albert Spear Hitchcock - 1914 - 312 pages
...to the rules [usually referred to as "list of nomina conservanda"]. (Art. 20.) No one is authorized to reject, change or modify a name (or combination...universally regarded as non-valid, or for any other motive cither contestible or of little import. (Art. 50.) When a species is moved from one genus into another,... | |
 | Robert Earle Buchanan - 1925 - 612 pages
...supervenes. Section 7. On names that are to be rejected, changed or modified Article 50. No one is authorized to reject, change or modify a name (or combination...contestable or of little import. (See also art. 57.) Recommendations. See on the subject of homonyms recommendations Vb and XIV which suggest that cases... | |
 | Robert Earle Buchanan - 1925 - 612 pages
...not justified in substituting names which he preferred for old and valid designations. The expression "because of the existence of an earlier homonym which is universally regarded as non-valid" is one which permits of a variety of interpretations. The zoologists insist upon the rejection of any... | |
 | Pennsylvania Academy of Science - 1926 - 644 pages
...homonyms are interesting. The International Rules state that no one is authorized to reject a name "because of the existence of an earlier homonym which is universally regarded as non-valid," and also that "when a species is moved from one genus to another, its specific epithet must be changed,... | |
 | Royal Society of New Zealand - 1908 - 710 pages
...oldest in any genus. In a similar manner, the affirmation of the principle that no one can reject a name because of the existence of an earlier homonym which is universally regarded as non-valid will cause a few alterations. For instance, Mr. Bark's name of Lepidium flexicaule, given under the... | |
| |
No one is authorised to reject, change or modify a name (or combination of names) because it is badly chosen, or disagreeable, or another is preferable or better known, or because of the existence of an earlier homonym which is universally regarded as... 
