...value, in this case, stands as if the carrier had asked the value of the horses, and had been told bv the plaintiff the sum inserted in the contract. The...based on that value. The shipper is estopped from saying that the value is greater. The articles have no greater value, for the purposes of the contract...

...of the negligence of himself or his servants, said (p. 340, L. ed. p. 721, Sup. Ct. Rep. p. 15« ) : hound to respond in that value for negligence. The compensation for carriage is based on that value....

...the carrier is reasonable, and is as important as the rule which it qualifies. There is no justice in allowing the shipper to be paid a large value for...based on that value. The shipper is estopped from saying that the value is greater. The articles have no greater value for the purposes of the contract...

...that such was the valuation, and that the liability should go to that extent and no further. * * * "The limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt...based on that value. The shipper is estopped from saying that the value is greater. The articles have no greater value, for the purposes of the contract...

...as to value, even where the loss or injury has occurred through the negligence of the carrier. * * * The limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt...negligence. The co'mpensation for carriage Is based upon that value. The shipper is estopped from saying that the value to greater. The aiticles have no...

...consideration; for, as stated by Blatchford, J., in Hart v. Railroad Co., 112 US 331, 340, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1 "The limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt from liability for negligence. It does noi induce want of care. It exacts from the carriers the measure of care due to the value agreed on...

...Hart v. Pennsylvania RR Co., 112 Ü. S. 331-340. 5 .Sup. Ct. 151, 156 (28 L. Ed. 717), the court said: "The limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt...carrier the measure of care due to the value agreed. The carrier is bound to respond In that valuation for negligence. The compensation for carriage is...

...to value has no tendency to exempt frota liability for negligence. It does not induce want of care. The carrier Is bound to respond in that value for...based on that value. The shipper is estopped from saying that the value is greater. The articles have no greater value for the purposes of the contract...

...obtaining the lower of two or more rates of charges propoy-/ tioned to the amount of the risk. * * * ' The limitation as to . , value has no tendency to exempt from liability for negligence.'// * * * The statutory liability, aside from responsibility for the default of a connecting carrier in...

...consideration. For, as stated by Blatchford, J., in Hart v. Pennsylvania RR Co. 112 US 331, 340, " The limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt from liability for negligenceY It does not induce want of care. It exacts from the carriers the measure of care due to...